As more organizations prepare for and deploy hosted virtual desktops, it has become clear that there is a need to support two related but critical phases. The first is to inventory and assess the physical desktop environment in order to create a baseline for the performance and quality of the user experience for the virtual desktop counterparts. When planning and preparing, organizations would like to know which desktops, users and applications are a good fit for desktop virtualization and which ones are not. The second phase is to track the virtual desktops in production in order to proactively identify when performance and user experience does not meet expectations, as well as to continue to refine and optimize the desktop image and infrastructure as changes are introduced into the environment.
Because virtual desktops live on shared systems, the layers of technology make it more complex to measure and classify fitness and user experience. But with increased industry knowledge and the emergence of best practices, plus new purpose-built products such as Liquidware Labs’ Stratusphere FIT and Stratusphere UX, it is now possible to more accurately measure and classify both fitness and user experience. This white paper covers these best practices and provides an introduction to the VDI FIT and VDI UX classification capabilities in Stratusphere FIT and Stratusphere UX.
Chapter 1: An Introduction to VMware Virtualization
Chapter 2: Backup and Recovery Methodologies
Chapter 3: Data Recovery in Virtual Environments
In this 136-page study guide Jason and Josh cover all seven
of the exam blueprint sections to help prepare you for the VCP exam.
Free VCAP5-DCA Study
Picture this: You
round the corner and your CEO or another executive ambushes you with a question
about an IT issue that’s keeping him up at night…
Business leaders and executives often need quick answers
from IT, especially when there’s an issue underway and the ripple effects are
beginning to spread. How you respond in
these moments could make or break your career.
(Here’s a hint: they won’t want
This eBook will prepare you for those moments, showing you
how to think about IT ‘as-a-Service’ and communicate in the language your
leaders and executives understand, and the terms they care about.
Massive changes are occurring to how applications are built and how they are deployed and run. The benefits of these changes are dramatically increased responsiveness to the business (business agility), increased operational flexibility, and reduced operating costs.
The environments onto which these applications are deployed are also undergoing a fundamental change. Virtualized environments offer increased operational agility which translates into a more responsive IT Operations organization. Cloud Computing offers applications owners a complete out-sourced alternative to internal data center execution environments. IT organizations are in turn responding to public cloud with IT as a Service (IaaS) initiatives.
For applications running in virtualized, distributed and shared environments, it will no longer work to infer the “performance” of an application by looking at various resource utilization statistics. Rather it will become essential to define application performance as response time – and to directly measure the response time and throughput of every application in production. This paper makes the case for how application performance management for virtualized and cloud based environments needs to be modernized to suit these new environments.
In large IT organizations, monitoring tool sprawl has become so commonplace that it is not unusual for administrators to be monitoring 10 to 50 solutions across various departments.
Unified monitoring solutions like Zenoss offer a cost-effective alternative for those seeking to rein-in monitoring inefficiencies. By establishing a central nerve center to collect data from multiple tools and managed resources, IT groups can gain visibility into the end-to-end availability and performance of their infrastructure. This helps simplify operational processes and reduce the risk of service disruption for the enterprise.
This paper can help you make an effective business case for moving to a unified monitoring solution. Key considerations include:
• The direct costs associated with moving to a unified monitoring tool• The savings potential of improved IT operations through productivity and efficiency• The business impact of monitoring tools in preventing and reducing both downtime and service degradation
Download the paper now!
Virtually every area of human endeavour that involves the use of shared resources relies on a reservation system to manage the booking of these assets. Hotels, airlines, rental companies and even the smallest of restaurants rely on reservation systems to optimize the use of their assets and balance customer satisfaction with profitability. Or, as economists would say, strike a balance between supply and demand.
So how can a modern IT environment expect to operate effectively without having a functioning capacity reservation system? The simple answer is that it can't. With the rise of cloud computing, where resources are shared on a larger scale and capacity is commoditized, modeling future bookings and proper forecasting of demand is critical to the survival of IT. Not having proper systems in place leaves forecasting to trending and guesswork - a dangerous proposition that usually results in over-provisioning and excessive capacity.
Download this paper to learn how to manage the demand pipeline for new workload placements in order to improve the accuracy of capacity forecasting and increase agility in response to new workload placement requests.