Virtualization Technology News and Information
Large Organizations Moving to Clouds to Reduce Costs but Are Ill-Prepared to Achieve Goals According to CiRBA Survey

The majority of large organizations are migrating internal virtual infrastructure to the cloud because they believe it will reduce costs, according to a recent survey by data center analytics provider CiRBA, Inc. The survey finds that only 17 percent of organizations achieved their utilization and ROI goals with virtualization and yet, they intend to use similar planning and management approaches for their move to the cloud.   

CiRBA surveyed 94 executives responsible for virtual and cloud infrastructure decisions at organizations with more than 25,000 employees. The survey revealed that many organizations are ill-prepared to make the move: 77 percent of respondents plan to use cloud-vendor supplied tools or spreadsheets to plan the migration of workloads to the cloud and only 48 percent plan to implement new solutions to manage cloud infrastructure.

“While cloud operating models have the potential to reduce spend, it is more likely that infrastructure costs will increase if these initiatives are poorly planned and managed,” said Chuck Tatham, SVP, Operations & Business Development of CiRBA. “Virtualization provided many organizations with some quick hits in terms of cost savings on hardware, but the reality is that few have fully met their objectives for utilization and ROI. Despite this, the majority of organizations are betting on the cloud without dramatically changing the approach to planning these environments.”

Cloud operating models can naturally increase inefficient use of capacity and the amount of “excess” capacity an organization has on hand in internal clouds by their very design:

  • Providing users with self-serve access to capacity can result in buffet-style over-indulgence as application owners request more capacity than they actually need to safe-guard against risk.
  • Pre-defined instance configurations and sized “buckets” of capacity may enable easier management, but they can also result in built-in excess capacity in allocations vs. customizing allocations for each workload’s true requirement.
  • Increased responsiveness requires a supply of excess capacity to be held as a demand buffer for new workloads. Sizing this capacity requirement, however, is tricky and teams could end up with unnecessary idle capacity taking up room on the data center floor.

Key findings from CiRBA’s survey reveal that organizations will face a direct conflict between high hopes for cost reduction and poor planning and management methods:

  • 39 percent of respondents felt that virtualization costs were higher than expected or delivered an uncertain ROI.
  • 70 percent of respondents felt that moving to cloud infrastructure would decrease costs and 42 percent cited cost reduction as the primary reason they would move systems off of internal virtualized infrastructure to the cloud.
  • Despite the hopes for cost reduction, a total of 77 percent planned to take a very basic and biased approach to migration planning, using a cloud vendor-provided tool or spreadsheets to plan the migration of their workloads to the cloud.
  • 75 percent planned workload movements using spreadsheets in currently virtual environments, which not only slows response times, but also takes a very simplistic approach to sizing and placement in internal cloud environments.

According to Gartner analyst Alessandro Perilli, in the June 9, 2011 research paper “The Big Mind Shift: Capacity Management for Virtual and Cloud Infrastructures”:

“Gartner defines "optimized" as a virtual infrastructure where the workload placement satisfies all of an organization's technical, business, and compliance constraints and the capacity is allocated to avoid resource wasting (i.e., rightsized),”

Perilli also recommends:

“The capacity management tool should allow for the definition of complex, multi-dimensional placement rules according to the technical, business, and compliance constraints inherent to each service that the infrastructure is hosting,”

“Strategic workload placement is critical to achieving savings, particularly in internal clouds,” said Tatham. “Taking a manual approach to planning cloud migration, like many organizations have done with virtualization is a recipe for inefficiency and reduced return on investment. There are simply too many factors to consider in placement and capacity sizing decisions to be able to do so efficiently and accurately using home grown tools.”

CiRBA last week announced the upcoming release of analytics that support organizations in planning migration to internal, external, and hybrid cloud environments. The new analysis solution, is designed to help organizations determine how to setup their internal cloud environments, as well as the optimal environment, placement, instance size and software profile to migrate individual workloads to considering policies, workload requirements and costs. CiRBA 6.2 will be available in July 2011.

Published Tuesday, June 14, 2011 3:56 PM by David Marshall
Filed under: ,
There are no comments for this post.
To post a comment, you must be a registered user. Registration is free and easy! Sign up now!
<June 2011>