
Virtualization and Cloud executives share their predictions for 2016. Read them in this 8th Annual VMblog.com series exclusive.
Contributed by Martin Taylor, CTO, Metaswitch
2016 and the Rise of Network Function Virtualization – Practicality Rules
With
network function virtualization moving into the mainstream and proliferation of
related technology offerings on the rise, clarity of purpose and ease of use is
more critical than ever. Winning solutions in 2016 will combine purpose-built
technology with turn-key simplicity, making it easy for network operators to
understand, adopt and scale NFV deployment system-wide.
1. Pragmatic network operators will
progress the fastest in 2016; those who deploy proven VNFs that are
not too demanding on cloud, SDN, orchestration or OSS/BSS integration will
usefully move the virtualization needle in 2016. Leading solutions will:
-
Deliver
high availability on vanilla cloud infrastructures
without relying on a specially-engineered cloud infrastructure to deliver high
availability.
-
Require
only basic IP connectivity from the NFV network fabric, vs. requiring a high
degree of programmability to create service function chains.
-
Have
simple life-cycles and be able to deliver most of their value with little or no
orchestration beyond initial deployment, vs. requiring sophisticated
orchestration.
-
Have
few and simple OSS / BSS touchpoints, rather than having complex configuration
and management requirements and involving a lot of custom work to interface
them to OSS and BSS.
2. VoLTE and CPE will be the two most
active areas of the network for NFV-based buildouts in the coming year.
-
VoLTE
is a service that requires a number of network functions to be deployed
including IMS, SBC, TAS and SCC-AS, all of which are available in virtualized
form.
-
Many
services offered by network operators require the deployment of multiple items
of CPE, e.g. Metro Ethernet access device, firewall, WAN accelerator, intrusion
detection system, enterprise SBC - each of which is currently deployed today as
a separate physical appliance.NFV offers the opportunity to virtualize
all these functions and deploy them as software in a generic CPE device based
on a server, or in a service provider's cloud in a metro data center, thus
removing the need to ship and install a multiplicity of physical appliances on
the customer premises.
3. While 2016 will see NFV cloud and orchestration
solutions mature, OSS/BSS will emerge as the biggest brake on NFV progress.
-
There
are two issues here. First, integration with OSS / BSS is usually the long pole
in the tent when it comes to deploying any new network function. There are
numerous backend systems that a network function needs to talk to for
provisioning, configuration, alarms, performance reporting, etc., and
integrating with a network function at each of these touchpoints often requires
custom software work. This issue does not go away just because a network
function is virtualized.
-
Secondly,
traditional OSS / BSS is not well suited to managing virtualized network
functions because its view of the world is appliance-centric and it doesn't
know how to handle shifting populations of different kinds of virtual machines
that together do the work of a physical appliance. OSS / BSS needs to evolve
very substantially to cope with the realities of NFV, and this will take time.
##
About the Author
Martin
Taylor is chief technical officer of Metaswitch Networks. He joined the company
in 2004, and headed up product management prior to becoming CTO. Previous roles
have included founding CTO at CopperCom, a pioneer in Voice over DSL, where he
led the ATM Forum standards initiative in Loop Emulation; VP of Network
Architecture at Madge Networks, where he led the company's successful strategy
in Token Ring switching; and business general manager at GEC-Marconi, where he
introduced key innovations in Passive Optical Networking. Martin has a degree
in Engineering from the University of Cambridge. In January 2014, Martin was
recognized by Light Reading as one of the top five industry "movers and
shakers" in Network Functions Virtualization.