Opens in a new tab
vmblog logo 2024 wht (updated)

How North America Can Lead the Autonomous Networks Race

Share: 

David Marshall | Published: September 1, 2025

By Dr. Srinivas Bhattiprolu, Head of Global Presales and Advanced Consulting Services, Nokia 

As digital demand surges and customer expectations evolve, North America’s communication service providers (CSPs) are at a crossroads: Move toward intelligent, autonomous networks or risk falling behind in a rapidly accelerating global race. 

According to TM Forum’s latest research on autonomous networks, North America is cautiously optimistic about this transition. While visionary ambitions are evident, the region is still wrestling with fragmented strategies, legacy infrastructure and gaps in implementation. 

The good news? The intent is there. So is the opportunity. 

High Aspirations Hold Back a Region Moving Too Slowly 

Compared to other regions, North America shows a notable commitment to automation. In fact, 34% of North American respondents say their organizations are at Level 2 automation and 22% are at Level 3. This is a meaningful signal that autonomous networks are not just theoretical but increasingly actionable. However, the same report reveals that most North American CSPs do not believe they will reach Level 4 autonomous networks until 2030. 

This measured pace may be rooted in scale. North American CSPs often operate across expansive geographies, with complex legacy systems that require careful orchestration of modernization efforts. Yet waiting for the “perfect” time to begin is a risk in itself. As other markets push forward, especially Asia-Pacific, where investment and execution levels are higher, North American CSPs must act with urgency. 

Building a Holistic Vision Beyond Tactical Initiatives 

The report underscores a common challenge: Automation efforts in North America are often siloed. Many CSPs have launched initiatives within specific domains, typically in customer service, transport or RAN, but these efforts often lack a broader, cross-functional strategy to guide them. 

This fragmented approach is further reflected in the region’s top three challenges on the path to autonomy: the immaturity of key enabling technologies, complex integration issues across domains, and the absence of a clearly defined end-to-end architecture. 

These findings highlight the need for a unified strategy that connects domain-level projects into a cohesive, scalable automation framework. 

This is a call to action for executive leadership. Moving toward autonomous networks requires a unified approach that connects business outcomes to automation roadmaps. It means aligning IT, network and operations around shared goals and ensuring that early wins in one domain can scale across others. The journey must be intentional, not opportunistic. 

Why Intent-Driven Networks Are More Than Just a Trend 

The shift to autonomous networks is not simply about replacing manual tasks with automation. It’s about building intent-driven networks that can interpret high-level business goals and dynamically reconfigure themselves in real time. These programmable, responsive systems offer enormous potential, from real-time service level agreement (SLA) assurance to energy optimization to dynamic slice management. 

Yet North America is trailing here. While global respondents rank “intent-based networking” among the top three enablers of autonomy, North American CSPs cite it far less often, suggesting a knowledge or readiness gap. 

To close this gap, North American CSPs should: 

  • Promote training and cross-functional collaboration to help teams understand how to frame business objectives as technical intents. 
  • Build out network APIs and real-time observability layers to feed AI/ML decision engines with the data required for intent fulfillment. 
  • Adopt digital twin environments to simulate and validate network decisions before real-world implementation. 
  • Define clear policies for human-in-the-loop automation, especially for high-stakes decisions like SLA violations or outage recovery. 
  • Invest in explainable AI (XAI) frameworks to ensure every recommendation can be traced, audited, and justified. 
  • Develop an autonomous network governance model that includes legal, ethical, and operational oversight from day one. 

What Comes Next for North America? 

While North America may not be leading the charge today, it has the scale, resources and talent to shape the future of autonomous networking, if it moves with speed and clarity. 

The TM Forum report advises starting with use cases that deliver business impact, such as automating service assurance, energy management or network slicing in enterprise environments. Frameworks and standards should be co-developed by encouraging collaboration across ecosystem partners – from hyperscalers to equipment vendors. Over time, the goal is to advance from pilot projects to platform thinking, where automation capabilities are modular, scalable and repeatable across network domains. 

The journey to autonomous networks is not just a technological evolution; it’s a strategic shift in how CSPs operate, compete and grow. In North America, the time to act is now. 

## 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR 

Dr. Srinivas Bhattiprolu, Head of Global Presales and Advanced Consulting Services, Nokia

 

As Head of Pre-Sales and Advanced Consulting Services at Nokia, Dr. Srinivas Bhattiprolu is primarily responsible for driving the company’s Cloud and Network services portfolio business and business consulting business. 

Dr. Srinivas is a result-oriented IT professional with over 22 years of techno-managerial experience. Srinivas has cultivated a strong understanding of the security domain, specializing in IoT Consulting and IoT Security, building solution blueprints and the corresponding use cases for communication service providers. He also possesses knowledge and working experience in various domains such as telecommunications, banking, financial services, and industrial process control. 

He holds several esteemed security certifications, including CISSP, Certified CISO, CCSP, and CISM. He also has C-CISO accreditation from EC Council